Re: Heralding

From: m_iacomi
Message: 31829
Date: 2004-04-10

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci" wrote:

>>> *** I am repeating this message, with one new entry, because,
>>> according to M. Iacomi, if you are not heralded by so-called
>>> authorities, your claim is not true or is dubious. :))***
>>
>> You may laugh, but you are asserting false ideas as being mine
>> and that's not nice at all.
[...]
>> So, you should have already understood that you were falsely
>> thinking at the idea "if you are not heralded by so-called
>> authorities, your claim is not true or is dubious" as being
>> mine. It is sad to see it re-emerging with the same false
>> label, even under the protection of a smiley. Feed back.

> Because I don't like to argue with you, I will cite a Latin
> sentence, valid even in law: Qui tacet consentire videtur.

It's not valid on discussion lists where people do not have any
obligation to answer to some marginal topic inserted in a message
of some contributor. Of course, you might keep your convictions if
you prefer illusions to proper understanding.
Anyway, my intervention was _not_ aimed to re-open the debate
about the topic, it was intended to clarify a misunderstanding
of yours which made you state a false allegation about me, as
one could realize by simple reading of the "Subject" line. After
puting it in clear, you are still in deep misunderstanding since
you are starting a different useless discussion:

> But, it's not valid concerning the words, present also in
> Albanian, <çikë> 'a little bit', [...] even Mr. Vidal claims
> that it can't be true, you insist on your attitude that you
> have right.

The right question at this point is: are you really reading
what I am writing? If not, just say so: it is senseless to lose
my time any longer. If yes, it's still bad since you have shifted
the issue deliberately. For what's worth: I do _NOT_ think that
"if you are not heralded by so-called authorities, your claim is
not true or is dubious" as you falsely asserted. That was the only
thing I wanted to hint out, the debate is closed: you should have
simply said: OK, I understood, now it's late.

Have a nice day,
Marius Iacomi