Re: [tied] Demonstratives

From: Brent J. Ermlick
Message: 31736
Date: 2004-04-06

In article <000d01c41b3c$11e62660$b2babac2@...> ????? ??i?dy??? <ponaryad@...> wrote:
. . .
> I don't think that *o:i here was a single phoneme. It would be better to interprete it as *o: + *i/*y (or even *o + *o + *i/*y). So the example is not valide.

Wouldn't this just be thematic *o + *oi (the o-grade of the normal
dative singular ending)?

Brent J. Ermlick Veritas liberabit uos