Re: [tied] Demonstratives

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 31607
Date: 2004-03-30

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:57:34 +0200, Miguel Carrasquer
<mcv@...> wrote:

>Given the Slavic cognate terms (e.g. Pol. oto), there is
>every reason to assume the Common Slavic form was *otU.

Vasmer's Ètimologicheskij Slovar' Russkogo Jazyka wasn't
available yesterday. It is now:

Word: vot

Near etymology: dial. vóto, oto, vôt, ukr. ot, dr.-russk.
oto, voto "ecce" (Nov. vrem. let.), pol'sk. oto, serboxorv.
``eto; Sm. Dolobko, ZfslPh 3, 107 i sl.; Sobolevskij, Lekcii
96; Preobr. 1, 99.

Further etymology: Mezhd. o, svjazannoe cheredovaniem s
ukazat. chast. e-, i mestoimennoe to(d); sm. tot po
Frenkel-ju BSl. 63. Nepriemlema rekonstrukcija i.-e. ho u
Fortunatova, AfslPh 12, 97.

Pages: 1,358


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...