Re: The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 30920
Date: 2004-02-10

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:02:36 -0800 (PST), enlil@... wrote:

>However, as I told Miguel *septm would have to be from
>Common Semitic since East Semitic doesn't work to explain
>the mimation chronologically or geographically.

East Semitic is the *only* solution that works to explain the mimation.
There is no other Semitic language that mimates the numerals. Not even
Sabaic, which mimates singular nouns in the absolute state, does that.

Miguel Carrasquer Vidal