Re: [tied] di:rigere

From: Daniel J. Milton
Message: 30669
Date: 2004-02-04

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
> 04-02-04 21:57, altamix wrote:
>
> > just for helping you out, there is no di:rigere > dërgoj.
> > Here you have incidentaly the "dë" in that position due
metathesis.
> > The latin "di:rigo" > "dregoj > dërgoj.
> > For this situation you have as testimony the Romanian
word "drege" which is
> > the same as Alb. "dërgoj" both supposed to have as etymon
Latin "di:rigere".
>
> Actually, I suspect the VLat. reflex of di:rigere (merged with
> de:rigere) > *dereg- may have oscillated between *drég-/*derg-'
> depending on the stress pattern (different reductions rather than
actual
> metathesis). *derg- --> *d&rg-ónj works better for Albanian,
since
it
> accounts for the preservation of VLat. -g- (one would expect it to
be
> lost between vowels). I don't know, however, if other Romance
> developments support my reconstruction, and if not, what they
suggest
> instead.
>
> Piotr
***********
For a non-Romance instance, there's English 'dirge' "funeral
hymn" < the first word of the ancient "Dirige, Domine".
See http://www.bartleby.com/61/59/D0245900.html

Dan Milton