[tied] Re: Late Proto Albanian *3 /dz/ = Early Proto Romanian *3 /

Hello Piotr,

1. How you justify here :

Lat. di: > PAlb. *di

and not

Lat. di: > PAlb. *3i > *di (or Di later di)

( similar with Romanian :

Lat. di: > ep-Rom. *3[i] > rom. *z[i] )

2. Also how you justify here :

Lat. rádia- > *rádja- --> Alb. *rä3^- > rreze.

and not

Lat. rádia- > *rádja- --> Alb. *rä3- > rreze.

( similar with Romanian :

Lat. rádia- > *rádja- --> ep-Rom. *rä3& - > Rom. raz& )

Best Regards,
marius alexandru

P.S. When we speak about these loans the PAlbanian transformation
3 -> D is ended or we still have 3 ?



--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:

> 03-02-04 21:21, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > Hello Alex,
> > I want to thank you for this presentation.
> > It shows that the situation of Albanian /di/ is much more

complex

> > that Miguel and Piotr presented here... (related to the stability

of

> > Latin /di/ in Albanian).
>
> Nothing of the kind. Lat. di: > PAlb. *di (with loss of *d if
> intervocalic, but that has nothing to do with the quality of *i).
>
> Lat. <di>/<ti> were realised as Proto-Balkan Latin *dj/*tj before a
> vowel (i.e., the original /i/ became non-syllabic), giving *3^/*c^
>
> Modern Albanian z/s, as in servítiu- > *servétju- --> Alb. *s&rbec^-
>
> shërbesë, or in rádia- > *rádja- --> Alb. *rä3^- > rreze.
>
> Piotr