Re: [tied] Re: Slavic *sorka (was: Satem and desatemisation (was: A

From: Mate Kapovic
Message: 30451
Date: 2004-02-01

----- Original Message -----
From: "elmeras2000" <jer@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 2:09 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Slavic *sorka (was: Satem and desatemisation (was:
Albanian (1)))


> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Mate Kapovic" <mkapovic@...>
> wrote:
>
> > This seems a very normal thing to expect in hypocoristics.
>
> Okay, fine. Just curious: What made you change your mind? The
> relevant arguments were already out in the open.

I never said that the formation is unusual typologically. I just doubt it
has any genetic connection with other (typologically) similar formations in
IE.

Mate