From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 30194
Date: 2004-01-28
> Hello Piotr,wrote
>
> First, I have no link with any "<bumbrek>/<bubrek>"...I never
> such things.put
>
> I wrote this message, only because I was suprised to see Piotr
> writting things like:
> << Alb. raketë : Rom. rachetã. It proves that rocket
> technology was first developed for travel in "Thracian space".
>>
>
> If these are your thoughts, and you think that are usefull to
> them on this forum....I really don't know what to say....(seemsthat
> some posting here really affect you...)your
>
> Best Regards,
> marius alexandru
>
> P.S. But honestly, until now, on the real topic, I don't see
> arguments ...regarding "the albanian loans in romanian"...you onlythe
> made this affirmation, and use it for further developments.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Piotr Gasiorowski"
> <piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Abdullah Konushevci" <a_konushevci@...>
> > To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:13 PM
> > Subject: [tied] Re: Against the theory of 'Albanian Loans in
> Romanian'
> >
> >
> > > One of biggest nonsense I have seen in Internet is treating
> wordfrom
> > <bumbrek>/<bubrek> 'kidney' as subtratal one, even by any one who
> > know just a little Turkish, may be noticed that it is a loan
> > Turkish <böbrek> 'kidney'. Furthermore, it was made by some onewho
> > knows relationship between Albanian and Romanian.that
> >
> > I've found another one: Alb. raketë : Rom. rachetã. It proves
> rocketAnd
> > technology was first developed for travel in "Thracian space".
> > seriously, this kind of blunder is not unknown even among************
> professional
> > linguists if they fail to check their data carefully.
> >
> > Piotr