From: alex
Message: 29670
Date: 2004-01-16
>> That appears funny and not at all scientifical. At least I don't seelike in ipsum > ins (individuum)?
>> any argument for sustaining it is more probable the posiblity of
>> *serpens > Sarpe ( what about ns > s > i here Piotr??????????) als
>> the probability of *serp- >Sarpe _even_ in a satem language?
>
> I think you'll find that the change s > i is restricted to stressed
> syllables, thus very largely to monosyllables.
> Richard.