Re: [tied] Re: Baltic RUKI etc.

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 29088
Date: 2004-01-04

On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:45:06 +0000, Richard Wordingham
<richard.wordingham@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Sergejus Tarasovas"
><S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:
>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...>
>wrote:
>> >
>> >...
>> > What are the examples of Lith. *is > is^ and *us > us^ (vetus^as
>> and aus^rĂ 
>> > come to mind)? What reasons are there to doubt the blocking of
>> RUKI before
>> > obstruent in Slavic? Any other comments on the matter?
>>
>> I have both the original Simas Karaliu:nas' article ...
>> ... and Hamp's (positive) reaction on it... Since you read
>Russian, it seems more
>> appropriate to me to scan both articles (a total of 19 pages) and
>> mail them to you and others interested.
>
>If they're going to be scanned in, would it be reasonable to put
>them in the file section for a week or so?

Seconded.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...