Re: [tied] Definite adjectives: correction

In article <qksstvkfks6me6nn1b8v7lfpc3vmg7gtcj@4ax.com> Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
. . .

> I forgot G.pl. -o:m (Lith. -u~N, although Slavic *-U seems to continue
> *-om). I also forgot that the abl.sg. was not *-o:t but must still have
> been uncontracted *-oot in PBS (>Lith. -o~, not *-uo~, Slavic pronominal
> -oo > -oho > -ogo).

I'm confused. Are you implying a general rule here of *h -> *g at some
stage of proto or common Slavic?

--
Brent J. Ermlick Veritas liberabit uos
brent3@...