Re: Prakrits (was Re: [tied] Non-lexical language trees)

From: Glen Gordon
Message: 28290
Date: 2003-12-10

Peter:
>Sorry to disappoint you gLeN.
>
>Please read my responses with a translation of the su_kta. There
>ain't no semen even though lopa_mudra_, wife of Agastya is involved.
>Let us not attempt a Courtright on the r.ca

Oh well, I'll just have to get my jollies on the idea of drug usage in
ancient times, I guess. Then again, we do know how sexual the Indians
were. What with those temples and the usage of lingams. It seemed
like the sharing of seminal fluids was a natural next step. But what if
soma isn't a metal, a mushroom or ephedra.

What if it IS semen! :) Didn't somebody say that the "root" has no
"leaves"? (Hehehe. Nothing like stirring up controversy, I must say.)


= gLeN

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963