Re: [tied] Romanian Swadesh list -> 10% substratual

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Piotr Gasiorowski"
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:

> I've just posted a different explanation of <doi> and <trei> (of

course I

> completely agree about nos > noi etc.). You prefer a purely

phonological

> solution, and I'd like to relate <doi> and <trei> to similar forms

in the

> rest of Romance (including the Western division).
>
> Piotr

there is no impediment of having all the atomic numerals from PIE
too. But absolutely none. Even for "unu" we have seen the evolution
of oi > u in Thracian, thus even this only problematic shows no
problem at all.

Alex