Roots... (Re: Dacian - /H/ -> seems possible)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "m_iacomi" <m_iacomi@...> wrote:

> He might not be aware of that. Actually he came from the very
> beginning on some speciality Romanian list with the declared
> program to prove Romanians are Dacians, then when one has pointed
> out Romanian _is_ a Romance language, he simply dedicated his
> enthusiasm to demolish that well-established fact. I think in
> some sense that one remark of mine (that Latin could be related
> to Dacian only at PIE level) made him look on the web and find
> this list which deals with IE issues.

Mr Iacomi is the person who like to proove some things in a
scientifical way. The eassiest way to proove the last theorie ( the
one with Alex finding cybalist after he spoked with Mr. Iacomi) would
be to see when Alex became a member of cybalist and when Alex became
a member of r-lang where he first meet Mr Iacomi. It ought to
remember that because of Alex, he, Mr Iacomi got a clue about
cybalist and he is now present here.. Now proove please this, see the
results and think about what you said.

> It fits well his purposes
> since one basical point of Romanian "autochtonist" agenda is to
> prove all IE are in fact nothing else but modified Dacian and PIE
> homeland is nothing else than Carpathian area where from all IE
> people spread out, changing by the same token their languages
> (unlike PIE ~ Dacian which had the mysterious propriety of
> conserving itself over millenia up to Romanian, only with some
> minor changes).

These Idea is new to me about IE being in fact Dacian. Any links,
where one can see these which sustain IE is derived from Dacian? The
PIE Homeland can be the Balkano-Carpathian space, this is one of the
posibilities and I don't see it as a wrong idea to sustain or to deny
this posibility. So far I remember I never said something about this.
It simply not in my field of activity right now.

> Regards,
> Marius Iacomi

Alex