Re: [tied] Re: Caland [was -m (-n)?]

From: Glen Gordon
Message: 27839
Date: 2003-11-29

Miguel:
>In your case, not only do you assert that such a semantic connection
>existed, without stating what it was, but you also fail to supply a reason
>_why_ *-u and *-ro had similar semantics in the first place

But I don't get what you're saying. They are both used for adjective
formation. Isn't that a semantic connection??


= gLeN

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca