Re: [tied] All of creation in Six and Seven

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> Some words in Romanian come from the non-Latin substrate virtually
> indistinguishable from Proto-Albanian. They stand apart precisely
> because they are not Latin (as opposed to the bulk of Romanian
> vocabulary). Of course they are more archaic than Modern Albanian
> because they were absorbed from an older stage of Albanian. This
> doesn't mean that Romanian itself derives from that substratal
> language, or that your "Thracian space" fantasy makes any sense.
>
> Piotr

You avoided any answer. I meant about Lautgesetze and not any Thracian
space fantasy.
I pointed out to the substratual words and _the way_ they derived from
PIE; that means:
a) from PIE roots to the form of these words there must be some
Lautgesetze
b) from Latin to Rom. words there must be too some Lautgesetze.

My question is clear:
Do you see any difference between Lautgesetzen of "a" comparative with
the Lautgesetze of "b"?

Alex