[tied] Re:Sumerian and bantu

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
wrote:

> I agree. Sumerian _is_ considered an isolate, in the most

conservative

> view. Nostraticists, on the other hand, consider it to be

ultimately

> related to Elamite, Dravidian, Kartvelian, and other Nostratic

languages

> within the past 15,000 years.

And you can find a group discussing sound laws relating Sumerian to
Uralic (and, nominally, Altaic and Dravidian) at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aturan-languages/ .

Richard.