Re: [tied] Re: Old Bulgarian -- Krivichian toponymic parallels

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergejus Tarasovas [mailto:S.Tarasovas@...]

> I see no problem with Slavic *o,gUlU having been rendered as Greek
> <ogglos>, but I can't guarantee that the etymology
> is true: it takes too many factors to evaluate (eg., do other
> undisputably Slavic toponyms of the same etymology exist? etc).

Old Russian <Uglec^e pole>, Russian <Uglic^> (a city in Yaroslavl'
district) could make a possible parallel (if from *o,gUlIc^I, a
substantivized possesive adjective <*o,gUlIcI, a diminutive < *o,gUlU).

Sergei