Re: [tied] az+

--- fortuna11111 <fortuna11111@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh
> <gknysh@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- fortuna11111 <fortuna11111@...> wrote:
> > If
> > > Bulgarians came from a region where Iranian
> > > languages were spoken
> > > heavily, I do not see why you would prefer the
> > > theory to the
> > > historical evidence.
> >
> > GK: Eva, don't forget that the Slavs (Proto-
> and
> > actual) were direct neighbours of Iranians for at
> > least 1200 years (and maybe more) before their
> "big
> > bang".
> >
>
> Yes, I reiterated this in another post. Yet this
> should be different
> from actual living together with an ?Iranian? people
> in a common state
> for several centuries. I find this to be quite
> unique about my
> country and worth researching.

*****GK: That's exactly the case with the "inner"
Neuri of Herodotus (those of the upper Bog/Boh in
contemporary right-bank Ukraine), part and parcel of
the Old Scythian state for centuries [6th-3rd c. BC].
That the "Stavani" had political connections with the
Late Scythian (in fact Aorsan-dominated) state of
pre-Gothic times is also archaeologically
demonstrable. I gather that in your scenario the
"Iranians" are the Proto-Bulgars? The difference here
is that you have yet to prove that the Proto-Bulgars
were Iranian.*****


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com