Re: [tied] about the wrong roots

From: alex
Message: 24092
Date: 2003-07-02

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:
> 02-07-03 21:27, alex wrote:
>
>> The tables should have been compilated by Valentyn Stetsyuk . He was
>> ( still is ?) too a member of cybalist.
>
> In other words, an informal source compiled by an amateur -- but an
> honest one! Valentyn says: "Attention for users! The etymological
> tables were created for statistical calculations only. There can be
> mistakes in writing and transliteration of many words in the Tables.
> Try to check spelling in dictionaries!" You didn't heed the warning
> -- otherwise you'd try to verify the data (which is far from complete
> and contains numerous mistakes).
>
> Piotr

Quote from Alex initial mail:

"one must observe in Avestan there is no initialy "sf-", "sv-", "sb-",
but just "sp-". At least this is what I could constate in teh online
dictionary of Avestan I could find. Are my data wrong?"

After Miguel expossed his view I added as follow:

"If these roots are not given corectly, I agree, I should
have had to verify them in a second source before posting it, thing
which I didn't and you can accuse me for it."

I tried to verify them as good I could, and this was not good enough.
The problem with Poorny online is that the display is very strange. At
least there must be done something for display the roots correctly. For
instance I get such a view:
c. k^uei-t- (k^u?ei-to-, k^u?ei-ti?o-, k^u?i-t(?)no-, k^u?i-t(?)ro-
`hell, weiß'):

Alex