[tied] Re: Catunari

There is no misunderstanding, it seems you didn't understand
Croation language: "-lo, live (or productive) suffix of neuter
gender, all-Slavic and pre-Slavic, derived from past active
participle: <bilo> 'was' (Vuk) from <biti> "to be".
And, as you may see, he is not talking about participle ending -l-
(PIE *-lo-), but he clear stressed that it is derived from past
active participle <bilo> 'was'.

Konushevci
************
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:

> 28-06-03 02:03, Abdullah Konushevci wrote:
>
> > -lo, z'iv sufiks sr. r., sveslav. i praslav., postao od pro¹log
> > participa aktiva: bilo (sic!) n (Vuk) od biti
>
> As I thought, it's a curious misunderstanding on you part: the

active

> preterite participle ending is -l- (PIE *-lo-), and <bilo> is just

an

> example of its use! It comes from the participle: <bi-l, bi-la, bi-

lo>

> from <bi-ti> like <sta-l, sta-la, sta-lo> from <sta-ti> 'stand'.
>
> Piotr