Re: [tied] Thracian , summing up

Glen Gordon wrote:

> Alex:
>> As analyst, do you expect to see the same language which in 2-300
>> years became ( supposed) an another language ( Latin >
>> ProtoRomanian) for not changing in the next 1000 or 1500 years ?
>
> Well, because I'm an "analyst", I'm not going to waste my time parsing
> through incomprensible phrases, although appreciable as they are for
> their deceptive air of meaningfulness. Romanian derives from Latin --
> The End.
>
> I'll just keep deleting and hope that this Romanian storm passes by
> July.
>
>
> = gLeN

I hope took care of that. I hope you wont find any questions more here
with "romanians " beside of the strictly linguistics aspect. And I wish
you luck in your search of the habbitatum of IE-s and think about salt.
Meanwhile maybe you will find time to read in the Jahrbuch für die
östliche Latinität, nr. 3 1975-1976, Freiburg, München, a text of Prof.
Jean -Claude Bouvier form the University of Aix en Provence:

" Cela peut apparaître comme une boutade, mais c'est pourtant une vérité
scientifique, les écarts par rapport au "modèle" roman sont souvent pour
le roumain un moyen d'affirmer sa profonde romanité et, même, osons le
dire, son hyper-romanité."

Salt. Without salt life is a problem.

alex