Attention: John Croft

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Geraldine Reinhardt" <waluk@...>
wrote:

> Yes, I will be pleased to forward this to John Croft yet the only

places I'm able to reach him are at two egroups: cybalist &
nostratica (but I will do so).

>
> Anyhow, your akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com doesn't provide any

informatin.

>
> Croft is an excellent linguist. You haven't provided any of Dr.

Loga's archives.

>
> Gerrry
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bala Pillai
> To: subas@... ; akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com ; "Geraldine

Reinhardt"

> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:10 PM
> Subject: Re: A New Look at Origins of Species
>
>
> (Penang, Malaysia) Dr Loga,
>
> Yet another audience that needs to be exposed to precise and

condensed enunciation of your vast Sumerian-Tamil proof organising
energies. In time.

>
> (SF, Calif) Gerry: Can you forward this on to John Croft? I am

certain that he is not an expert in South Indian languages. Would
like to expose him to the vast proof of the nearly-all encompassing
parent-child relationship between Sumerian and Tamil. Have John skim
the archives of Dr Loga's postings at akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com -
- thanks Gerry.

>
> cheers../bala
> Bala Pillai, Sydney, Australia
> Acumen Networks/Mind Ecosystems/Global Brain
> http://www.ryze.com/go/bala
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Geraldine Reinhardt
> To: bigbangtango@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 8:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [bigbangtango] Re: A New Look at Origins of Species
>
>
> The most recent post I received from a member of Nostratica (John

Croft) was that Sumerian was an isolate. If that were so, then no
one could claim ancestry to Sumer & the Sumerians. One wonders
therefore if Sumer (the city) might have been populated by non-
mortals?

>
> According to Julian Jaynes, as recently as the late 2nd

millennium B.C., men had no consciousness and were automatically
obeying the voices of the gods.

>
> Thusly, when did the brain show expansion? Could have been

during the time of "Neanderthal" when we have physical evidence of a
body and head that was "bulked up". As far as origins of sexuality,
I think Howard would claim that it began when the first cyanobacteria
tangoed with each other (likely 7 or so billion years ago).

>
> I have more than 3 years of language origins posts in my group so

stop on by: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/language-origins

> and take a look.
>
> Gerry
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dil8net
> To: bigbangtango@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:42 PM
> Subject: [bigbangtango] Re: A New Look at Origins of Species
>
>
> I'm curious Gerry what findings would you be willing to share

with me

> about your inquiries into language origin(s)?
>
> I'm intrigued about the base language of the past from those of

maybe

> the Sumerians, Accadians...since we learn language from out

parents,

> and they learn from theirs, etc.
>
> And requirements to learn language prior to having parents to

teach

> would mean that the brain would have to develop in similar time

with

> the vocals and ears.
>
> These things also bring to mind the question of the origin of
> sexuality. The power of reproduction and the timing...capable
> persons arising to join and reproduce, the physical

requirements

> needed and the communication involved.
>
> arr, how these things branch off so easily.
>
>
>
>
> --- In bigbangtango@yahoogroups.com, "Geraldine Reinhardt"
> <waluk@...> wrote:
> > Michael, I've attached my enhanced blurb on the expansion of

my

> web page.
> >
> > Any further commentary?
> >
> > Gerry