Re: [tied] Androphobia [...]

On Thu, 29 May 2003 23:51:21 +0200, alex <alxmoeller@...>
wrote:

>This is what makes me crazy. You are absolutely sure and you put every
>where the "latin in" which simply is overcharged if not absolutely
>wrong. The examples where we have aromanina "ãn" and dacoromanian "în"
>speaks for not being "latin in" there since from "in" you cannot have an
>"ãn".

Sure you can: in the prefix în-, ãn-. The î- of Daco-Romanian here
developed out of a schwa (ã), the same way that it did in îmi (ãmi),
îtzi (ãtzi), îszi (ãszi), îi (ãi). The prefix in- (VL > en-) first
was reduced to n- (cf. ex- > s-), and then acquired a prosthetic
schwa.


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...