Re: [tied] Pronoun

On Sun, 18 May 2003 17:57:35 +0200, alex <alxmoeller@...>
wrote:

>Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>>> Miguel, the regular change is from this "ollu" and "ulla" not from
>>> "ille".
>>> Do you agree?
>>
>> Obviously not.
>>
>> Port. Spa. Cat. Fre. Ita. Rom.
>> m. ele él ell il (egli, ei) el
>> f. ela ella ella elle (ella) ea
>> n. ello
>>
>> m. eles ellos ells ils (eglino) ei
>> f. elas ellas elles elles (elleno) ele
>>
>> All regularly from ille/illum, illa(m), illi/illos, illae/illas.
>>
>> =======================
>> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>> mcv@...
>
>
>What do you have to look for here with the personal pronoun? We have
>spoked about the demonstrative pronoun

Same thing.

>and the "-ua" and "-ul" which are by no mean to get phoneticaly from
>"ille" but from "ollu/ulla".

Don't be ridiculous. The ending of the masc. article is -l, the -u is
originally part of the noun.

lupu(m) > lupu > lup
lupu(m) illu(m) > lupu-lu > lupul > /lupu/


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...