Re: [tied] cardinal points

Glen Gordon wrote:

> Alex, being confused:
>> 1) which books?
>

Glen, very seriously:

> The ones at a library

>
>> 2) well, from the intervention of Marius Iacomi I understood
>> there is no relationship between the words in Rom. and these from
>> P.Gmc, you mean there should be any?
>
> I mean that your theories are a hundred years _too late_. So
> why are you trying to explain something that is already explained
> by others, whose books can be found at a library that you obviously
> aren't going to?
>
>
> - gLeN

Nts, nts, nts, obviously you forgot to take with you your fiercely logic
here or you proceded (am sure you was in hurry) just as some linguists
do, seeing just a part of the apple, the one they want:-))

Glen, your topic of interest is the Proto-Stepe and some levels deeper
as IE. My interests are certainly not the same as yours. But since you
know better, have you some idea about the names of those whose books are
to find in the library where usualy, when I go there, I read something
else as you? It will be nice to hear of some names who explained already
"my theory":-)

alex