Re: [tied] Proto-Albanian

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

>> If we take in consideration words as "a spune"= to say which is
>> assumed to comme from Latin "exponere" as Mr Iacomy say, then we
>> will see that indeed it doesn't matter where the accent is and we
>> have indeed an "s" from "x"
>
> This is completely irrelevant. We were not talking about /ksC/, which
> always gives /sC/

hmmm.. well look.
Statisticaly from the Latin compounds which begun with "ex-" there is no
word in Romanian where after "x-" has a vowel.
All the inherited verbs are with "xC". And this seems to be curious. Is
this an accident that no compound is mentained in Romanian of exV-? Just
the exC?
But the exC is exactly the PIE *sk and curious again, this is very
present in Rom. but seen as a derivation of Latin "exC-". Simple
accident? Of course, rethorical question..

>> For the semantic sense, unfortunately I don't have now at hand all
>> the senses of exponere
>
> I. to put out(side), to show; to place; to abandon (a child, a
> foundling); to put ashore; to put at someone's disposal; to expose,
> put in danger
> II. to imagine; to award (a prize); to explain, to describe; to prove;
> to narrate
>
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

Thank you. At least " to describe, to explain" whould matches the
semantic sense. If there was indeed in the Vulgata "quo modo tibi
exponere" ( cum iTi spune?(how are you called?) let be an another
story-:)