Re: [tied] Re: Pronouns again

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>
> As far as I can tell, this attempt at analyzing 'ego' end up with an
> unexplained -g'- which also means "I". Next question (same question):
> where did -g'- come from?

I am simply contemplating the easiest solution, viz. that the -g'- is
ultimately the same element as *-H2 (and perhaps even *-m-). It comes at a
price that makes it less than appealing, but I have seen worse things
that were true.

Jens