[tied] Re: Help with ban_Banat

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex_lycos" <altamix@...> wrote:

> Since the name "Banat" is conserved in the actually Rom. Lang.,
> I ask myself why no trace of the another name "za guru"?
> BTW, the "ban" is in Serbian and Bulgarian old stories allways in
> relationship with Romanians, I am wrong here?
>
> As for "-at" one could connect it with "hanat", "kaghanat" for
> showing the bulgarian trace,

the titles of 'khan' or 'khagan' are not attested in Bulgar. Apart
from the use of 'khagan' in one late (XI c.) apocriphal, i.e.
unofficial, source. I don't know where you brought these khanates and
khaganates from.

Regards,
Vassil


but in the same way it can be related

> to "regat", "ducat" for corelating it with the european words.