NumberAuthorDateTitle
Earlier messages
18900Jean Kelly2003-02-19Tolkien and Germanic astronomy
18901Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-19Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18902Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-19Re: [tied] Re: Tolkien and Germanic astronomy
18903S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-19Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18904S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-19Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18905Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-19Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18906Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-19Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18907Vassil Karloukovski 2003-02-19Re: [tied] isoglosses and substrate
18908m_iacomi 2003-02-19Re: [tied] isoglosses and substrate
18909S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-19Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18910S & L2003-02-19Help with ban_Banat
18911aquila_grande 2003-02-19Re: "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18912george knysh2003-02-19Re: [tied] "Will_the_‘real’_linguist_please_stand_up?"
18913george knysh2003-02-19Re: [tied] Help with ban_Banat
18914P&G2003-02-19Re: [tied] Jubar
18915alex_lycos2003-02-19Re: [tied] isoglosses and substrate
18916Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-19Re: [tied] "Will_the_'real'_linguist_please_stand_up?"
18917alex_lycos2003-02-19Re: [tied] Jubar
18918alex_lycos2003-02-19was "elVs" an PIE suffix?
18919Juha Savolainen2003-02-19Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18920S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-20Re: "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18921Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-20Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18922S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-20[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18923Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18924S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18925Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18926Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18927S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18928Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18929Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18930P&G2003-02-20Re: [tied] Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex 1
18931S & L2003-02-20Re: Help with ban_Banat
18932dubnovalos 2003-02-20Gaelic "fang" Indo-European cognates?
18933Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-20Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18934Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18935P&G2003-02-20Re: [tied] Jubar
18936P&G2003-02-20Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18937tgpedersen 2003-02-20Re: Gaelic "fang" Indo-European cognates?
18938Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18939P&G2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18940Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18941Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18942tgpedersen 2003-02-20Re: Hairy Venus
18943S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-20[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18944Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-20Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18945Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-20Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18946S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18947tgpedersen 2003-02-20Nostr.? *w-t- , *w-g-
18948Sergejus Tarasovas2003-02-20Re: [tied] Nostr.? *w-t- , *w-g-
18949Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-20Re: [tied] Nostr.? *w-t- , *w-g-
18950george knysh2003-02-20Re: [tied] RE:Re: Help with ban_Banat
18951tgpedersen 2003-02-20Re: Nostr.? *w-t- , *w-g-
18952tgpedersen 2003-02-20Re: [tied] Nostr.? *w-t- , *w-g-
18953S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-20What was the language spoken in Meluhha?
18954Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-20Re: [tied] Help with ban_Banat
18955george knysh2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will_the_'real'_linguist_please_stand_up?"
18956Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will_the_'real'_linguist_please_stand_up?"
18957Daniel J. Milton 2003-02-20Re: [tied] Help with ban_Banat
18958Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-20Re: [tied] Help with ban_Banat
18959Max Dashu2003-02-20[tied] RE:Re: Help with ban_Banat
18960John L. Berry2003-02-20Re: [tied] Digest Number 1245
18962Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18963Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18964alex_lycos2003-02-20Re: [tied] Help with ban_Banat
18965Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18966Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-20Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
18967Glen Gordon2003-02-20More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
18968Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18969Glen Gordon2003-02-20Re: [tied] "Will the ‘real’ linguist please stand up?"
18970Glen Gordon2003-02-21Re: [tied] Digest Number 1245
18971Brian M. Scott2003-02-21Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
18972Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-21Re: [tied] Seldom
18973S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-21[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18974Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18975S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-21[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18976Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18977S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-21[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18978Glen Gordon2003-02-21Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
18979Brian M. Scott2003-02-21Re[2]: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
18980Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18981S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-21[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18982Piotr Gasiorowski 2003-02-21[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18983P&G2003-02-21Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
18984P&G2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18985P&G2003-02-21Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
18986tgpedersen 2003-02-21[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18987Daniel J. Milton 2003-02-21Re: [tied] Help with ban_Banat
18988george knysh2003-02-21Re: The satemization process( Was: [tied] "Will_the_'real'_linguist
18989S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-21[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18990Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18991S & L2003-02-21Help with ban_Banat
18992george knysh2003-02-21Re: [tied] Help with ban_Banat
18993Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18994Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-21Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
18995Anne Lambert2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18996Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18997Juha Savolainen2003-02-21Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18998S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-22[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
18999george knysh2003-02-22Re: The satemization process( Was: [tied] "Will_the_'real'_linguist
Later messages