Miguel:
>In fact we have been discussing just that, ad nauseam, in the
>case of Romanian, where we have the soundlaws:
According to you, *m- caused resistence of *a>*o but not *n-.
Why on earth? Your claim is ad hoc because there's no phonetic
justification for this. We don't find the needed answer in your
distractive Romanian vowel grid.
- gLeN
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus