Re: Fw: [tied] Latin versus *Proto-Romance

From: tgpedersen
Message: 18444
Date: 2003-02-05

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <tgpedersen@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Latin versus *Proto-Romance
>
>
>
> > I recall you proposed to divide early North Germanic society into
earls and churls once; might in that case the latter not be derived
from a similar source (obviously they are not PIE cognates) as
*korljI?
>
> It would work formally, but not semantically. The churls were men
without rank, the lower order of freemen. Actually, Charlemagne's
name seems to contain *karla-, but a more direct connection is
unlikely.
>
> Piotr

Which means, I suppose, it would work if North Germanic society was
two- (or several-) tiered, which is also what the story says?

Torsten