Re: [tied] Re: Reconstructing a future language

From: Juha Savolainen
Message: 18390
Date: 2003-02-03

Or this one:

http://www.cladistics.org/about.html


Juha








--- Juha Savolainen <juhavs@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
> Do you think this reference might help here:
>
> http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/clad/clad4.html
>
> Cheers, Juha
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Piotr Gasiorowski <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <tgpedersen@...>
> > To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:20 PM
> > Subject: [tied] Re: Reconstructing a future
> language
> >
> >
> > > I think you're making unwarranted assumptions
> > about the metric they used (but you might of
> course
> > be right). I'll get back with the
> > > reference tomorrow, so you can see for yourself.
> >
> > Judging from the effects you have reported, I
> > suppose it's either the experiment described and
> > duiscussed by April McMahon, Marisa Lohr and Rober
> > McMahon ("Family trees and favourite daughters")
> in
> > Renfrew and Nettle (1999. _Nostratic: Examining a
> > Linguistic Macrofamily_) or something very similar
> > to it. If so, I know what to expect.
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com