From: Patrick C. Ryan
Message: 18167
Date: 2003-01-26
----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Green
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alex_lycos" <altamix@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 6:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Yellow as an PIE word
<snip>
> The derivation of <verde> etc. from <viridis> is straightforward and unproblematic. Both words mean 'green'. The syncope of the unstressed medial /i/ in <virdis> is not only a natural process but it's also directly attested (see, e.g., _Appendix Probi_). Why complicate matters by introducing unattested and unlikely prototypes? Of course Latin couldn't have been the source of the Romance word, since in Latin *werdH- would have become *verb-. But do you know a reflex of *werdH- in _any_ language with the meaning 'green' or the like?
>
> Piotr
<PCR>
A prime example is Hieroglyphic Egyptian w3D, 'green'.
Egyptian [3] is known to originally have been a kind of /r/ contrasting with [r].
Pat
PATRICK C. RYAN | PROTO-LANGUAGE@... (501) 227-9947 * 9115 W. 34th St. Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 USA WEBPAGES: PROTO-LANGUAGE: http://www.geocities.com/proto-language/ and PROTO-RELIGION: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2803/proto-religion/indexR.html "Veit ec at ec hecc, vindgá meiði a netr allar nío, geiri vndaþr . . . a þeim meiþi, er mangi veit, hvers hann af rótom renn." (Hávamál 138)