From: alex_lycos
Message: 18103
Date: 2003-01-25
> "S.Kalyanaraman <kalyan97@...>" writes:Upssssssss, this is something else. One would make a connection with
> <<Yes, varn.a = colour;... haridvarn.a, `of a yellowish golden
> colour'>>
>
> <varn.a, varNa> probably did not mean "color" in the modern sense of
> an color, independent of a particular object or process. More
> probable, as a reference to hue, is that it referred to the result of
> a particular process
> -- "dyed, impressed, covered or painted".
>
> In looking at the numerous definitions of <varNa>, we can get some
> rough ideas about what the original meaning might have been.