From: alex_lycos
Message: 18034
Date: 2003-01-24
> ----- Original Message -----Aaam, well, it seems I have not succeeded to say very clear what I
> From: "alex_lycos" <altamix@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Re: yellow
>
>
>
>> Just a more question; could it be they are derivatives of the colour
>> white? alb, gãlb, spelb= white, yellow, pale( spelb=just about the
>> colour of the face when someone is sick and his face has a very pale
>> colour).For "white" there is clear no Latin word even if there is
>> "albus" in latin (see Alboca, Albocensii& co for getic space)
>
> Why isn't <albus> a "clear" term for 'white', in your opinion? It's a
> word with an IE etymology and a host of Latin derivatives, and I
> can't see what could prevent us from regarding it as a basic colour
> term in Latin (as opposed to such specialised adjectives as
> <candidus> 'shining-white' or poetic <ca:nus> 'greyish-white,
> hoary'). There was no shortage of words describing colours in Latin
>There have been just toughts for the similarity of the fonetical form
> As for deriving <galbinus> etc. from <albus> -- well, you can't do
> that, but perhaps an earlier form (borrowed from Gaulish? cf.
> <gilvus>) was contaminated by <albus>
>
> Piotr
>
> Piotr