Re: [tied] Pronouns again

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:20:41 -0000, "tgpedersen
<tgpedersen@...>" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>On your propsed cognates: Would you suggest that they are original
>cognates, or that they are borrowed, and in that case in which
>direction (or are you only making the observation)?

There have been some recent publications about Sumerian <-> IE
borrowings, although I don't remember the details. My feeling is that
some of them may be cognate, some of them borrowed (I wouldn't know in
which direction). Some of them may simply be coincidences.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...