From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 17789
Date: 2003-01-19
> Perhaps. In Old Polish, zaNbrz was used for "tiger" (modern PolishActually, <iz'ubr'> 'deer Cervus elaphus'.
> z.ubr has irregular z^- for z- [Mazurian dialect?] and -/u/- for
> -/oN/- [East Slavic?]).
> Except for Russian dialectal <izubr> with i-,
> the other Slavic forms point to *zoNbrU (or *zoNbrI), which couldbe a
> regular adjectival formation from *g ^ombhos "tooth", *g^ombh-rossu:brs
> "toothy, toothed". However, the word also occurs in Baltic, and the
> initial there does not correspond with Slavic z-: Latv. sumbrs,
> or subrs with s-, Lith. stum~bras with st-...If related to Slavic *zo,brU, the Lithuanian form may be influenced