Re: [tied] *pa(x)u- "small" and "fire"?

From: P&G
Message: 17456
Date: 2003-01-07

> >If you are talking about the schwebeablaut alternation CVCC / CCVC in PIE
> >in general, then isn't it rather more widespread than just those
> >extensions?
> ...only verbs that were originally *CVCVC- in shape
> should have produced these oscillations. Verbs of the original form
> *CVCCV- would not be able to yield this result.

Thanks. This helps me see where you're coming from.