> >If you are talking about the schwebeablaut alternation CVCC / CCVC in PIEThanks. This helps me see where you're coming from.
> >in general, then isn't it rather more widespread than just those
> ...only verbs that were originally *CVCVC- in shape
> should have produced these oscillations. Verbs of the original form
> *CVCCV- would not be able to yield this result.