Re: [tied] the tongue

From: alexmoeller@...
Message: 17254
Date: 2002-12-22

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <alexmoeller@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] the tongue


> Same as in <lingula>. In <angustus> we have [-gu-] (with syllabic
> /u/), which DOES NOT give Rom. b. The latter developped only from
> [-gw-], i.e. <-gu-> followed by a vowel!
>
> Piotr


In this case is just "gw"+vowel who gave a "b" in romanian.
Unfortunately we have again irregularities like:

a intreba= to ask, from the Latin "interrogare" where a simple "ga" gave
to an "b" in Romanian.
sîngera= to blood from Latin "sanguinare", where expected was
"sâmbinare" not "sângera" ( with affricated "g")
lingoare= typhoid fever from Latin languor,-languoris

It seems, as usual, how many rules , so many exceptions.

regards,

alex