From: tgpedersen
Message: 17091
Date: 2002-12-10
>frequent, might it be a way to get from *egHo: to *egH (*egH' ?)at an
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <tgpedersen@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] The 1ps pronoun *ego:... or is it *eg?
>
>
>
> > Actually the libretto is in Latin. If the phenomenon is that
>If the old nominative was *mu, parallel to *tu, as Glen suggests, it
> But if so, how do you account for *eg^(H)om?
>
> Piotr