From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 16903
Date: 2002-11-28
>If the Slavic 'eagle' word is to be analysed as an *-ln- stem, it should perhaps be derived from *h2arl.n-o- > *arilna- > *orIlU; then at least the right vocalism falls out naturally, and the loss of *n has to be explained somehow in either case.Or *h2orl.n-o-, of course.
>I also wonder if the 'salt' word could not belong here; cf. Gk. halios (like *ha:welios) < *sallijos < *s(h2)alnijos (?), Slavic *solnU 'tasting of salt'. Perhaps neuter *saln > *sald (rather than **salr., because of liquid dissimilation), whose generalisation might explain why there's no **sann- in Germanic.Or a grain of sand? In any case, Pokorny posits a Gen. sal-n-és,
>
>Jus' speculatin'. Take it with a grain of sal.