From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 16847
Date: 2002-11-22
> -----Original Message-----*picga)
> From: tgpedersen
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:46 PM
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Old Subject: [tied] Re: Real or Spurious Root Matches? (was OE
> --- In cybalist@..., "Richard Wordingham"<richard.wordingham@...>
> wrote:(yuck -
> > --- In cybalist@..., "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> > > That's why I imagined it must have loaned at a time
> > > when AfroAsiatic roamed a lush Sahara for there to have been a
> > > unbroken linguistic connection between coast and interior
> > is3. external contact
> > > this English?).
> >
> > Drought refugees from a still lush Sahara?
>
> I imagined the temporal sequence something like this:
> 1. lush
> 2. drought
>
> > Your notion of an 'unbroken linguistic connection' is one I'dhoped
> > to see explored for early Indo-European. I'd asked what breaksup
> acontinuum
> > dialect continuum, ...
> Here's my answer: War. It causes shibboleths to arise (or they may
> have formed in the process of polarisation leading up to war).
>
> >I
> > had wondered if there were some size limit beyond which a
> > would break up, like Roche's limit for satellites. I'm not sureFor break-up or diffusion? I've since done some modelling which
> >how
> > well words would diffuse within a continuum.
> Think of Northern India.
> >Think of Romance orI'm not so sure shibboleths break up dialect continuums. I have a
> > Scandinavian for hard evidence.
> >
> I have some Scandinavian data in
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/rant/tgpedersen/Shibbolethisation.html
> BTW: For several hundred years the now North French coast from thespeaking.
> present Belgian border to Boulogne and beyond was Germanic-
> That means from Hengist and Horsa on there was an unbrokenSo what broke it? The Danish invasions? The Scandinavian colonies
> AngloSaxon - North German dialect continuum.