Re: [tied] again gW>b and getae

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 16775
Date: 2002-11-15

Avec plaisir, but show me your data first. Which particular hydronyms exhibit this change?
 
Piotr
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: alexmoeller@...
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:58 PM
Subject: [tied] again gW>b and getae

And for kW>p is nothing to say against it.There are too many hidronims which shows that kW>p in thracian. Am wrong again Piotr?

If yes, I will be very greatfully if you will show me why.