--- In cybalist@..., Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>Slavic *ed-i:nU "1", perhaps *h1dh-néwm.
Why are you not happy with the more traditional reconstruction
*jedinU< *(h1edH-)HoiH-no-s, supported by Sl. *inU 'one' < *HoiH-no-
s, with BSl. *ái > (sporadically) *éi, as in Lith. _víenas_ (probably
also from [*something > v-] plus *HoiH-no-s) alongside OPruss. _ains_?
Sergei