From: tgpedersen
Message: 16532
Date: 2002-10-28
> There were earlier messages on Nahali. I deeply appreciate theon
> insightful comments of Piotr. Here is an elaboration which proceeds
> on the assumption that Nahali is an Indo-Aryan dialect and provides
> an outline of Me-lah-ha dialect, c. 4th to 3rd millennia BCE.
>
> http://www.hindunet.org/saraswati/sindhu1.pdf
>
> Mleccha, Milakkha or Me-lah-ha: maritime people and their language
>
> The argument is that mleccha connoted the parole of a proto-Indo-
> Aryan language and that mleccha speakers were the dominant
> population Bha_ratam janam --, from the days of the R.gveda,
> variously referred to as da_sa, dasyu, vra_tya or asura all terms
> used as behavioral traits as were the terms, a_rya or deva,
> connotations of 'excellence' or 'righteous behaviour'. There is not
> an iota of evidence, in early periods of the civilization of
> Bha_ratavars.a, to treat these terms as ethnic identities.
>
> Art, cultural texts, epigraphs, archaeological discoveries, notes
> early shell- and metallurgical- techniques and economic texts areamong
> used to substantiate this argument.
>
> A surprise result emerges: a key to decode epigraphs using rebus
> method and proto-phonetic variants (substratum) of present-day
> languages of the Sarasvati Civilization area, relating epigraphs to
> the professions of lapidaries and smiths: shell-/stone-/mineral-
> /metal-workers.
>
> The indigenously evolved civilization matured in an extensive area
> from Ropar to Lothal along the banks of River Sarasvati and the
> cultural heritage lives on in Bha_rata, thanks to the contributions
> made by mleccha (me-lah-ha), contributions exemplified by samudra
> manthanam (churning of the ocean), as a co-operative endeavour
> bha_ratam janam.The other night I got a really, really bad idea: