From: george knysh
Message: 16190
Date: 2002-10-12
> dialect*****GK: Cf. below. Strabo is not comparing free and
> > > continuum on the
> > > South shore of the Baltic between the Baltic
> (Old
> > > Prussian) languages
> > > in (East) Prussia and the (Old) Germanic
> languages
> > > of Denmark and
> > > Sweden, a continuum that was breached by a
> Celtic
> > > colonization of the
> > > South shore (cf. Tacitus' remark that the Aestii
> > > spoke a language
> > > similar to that of the Britons)?
> >
> > (GK:) I think we should be careful in not
> reading
> > too much into Tacitus' remark that the "Aestii"
> spoke
> > a language like that of the Britons. This is a
> > statement of the same category, it seems to me as
> > Strabo's (if I remember correctly) comment that
> the
> > Romans called the Germans "Germani" because the
> latter
> > were "genuine Celts". The only thing I could think
> off
> > to explain Tacitus was the possibility that some
> form
> > of Celtic could have played the role of lingua
> franca
> > along the Amber road as late as the 1rst c.
> AD.
> > >
>
> In at least Caesar's time, archaeologically there is
> the same culture
> on both sides of the Rhine, I believe I read
> somewhere. That means
> Strabo's remark would make sense (although it
> wouldn't be true),
> since the Celts on the right bank of the Rhine would
> be free Celts.
> It all mixes beautifully with a Germanic******GK: Here is the passage from Strabo (VII.1.2):
> colonization of the area of
> Germania at that time. Which I'm not the first to
> suggest.