Re: [tied] Re: sanskrit "bhuman"

From: alexmoeller@...
Message: 16112
Date: 2002-10-09

----- Original Message -----
From: "m_iacomi" <m_iacomi@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:40 AM
Subject: [tied] Re: sanskrit "bhuman"



Phonetically, the Logudorese "pamentu" proves there is no
problem
of derivation: a vernacular late Latin form "*paumentu(m)"


[Moeller]
Piotr advised me to do not discusee here such kind of
etymology anymore. And I do not find faire from you to avoid
provoque me on r-lang , but to say such things here where I
promissed that I wont discusse them anymore due the respect
for the people who are not interested in latin-romanian stuff.