From: george knysh
Message: 15875
Date: 2002-10-02
> Piotr also wrote:*****GK: Rivers were sometimes known by different
> <<I'm not defending Pliny's general credibility but
> just this particular
> piece of geography. His sources seem to have been
> quite reliable here. By
> "clari" he meant "distinguished", i.e. major
> rivers.�As for such rivers,
> the�only surprising omission between the Vistula and
> the Rhine seems to be t
> he Oder, but if George is right and Guthalus IS the
> Oder, then the list is
> complete. No other name is garbled, so why should
> Guthalus be an exception?>>
>
> What is actually odd about Guthalvs is that nobody
> else mentions it. If
> Guthalvs was such a famous river, why did no one
> else mention it?
>*****GK: Pomponius Mela in his "De Chorographia" ,
> Pliny couldn't have garbled the Rhine or the Elbe,
> because those rivers were
> all in Latin writing well before his time. And it
> is very possible that
> Pliny is the source of the name of the Vistula --
> did any one give the name
> before him?
> became the name of the******GK: I suggest you read Pliny at 37,30ff of the
> river.
>
> The real problem here is why Guthalvs did not become
> the name of a river.
> There are many possibilities, but here are two.
> Ptolemy did not use the name
> so it was trash canned (except by Solinus) or later
> writers and redacting
> scribes just did not know where to locate it and it
> was trash canned.
>
> Pliny is not talking about whole rivers but about
> their emptying into the
> "Ocean". Since I didn't get any kind of coherent
> answer to my suggestion
> that Pliny's list is a mariner's list,