Re: [tied] Lith. Acc.pl.

-----Original Message-----
From: Miguel Carrasquer [mailto:mcv@...]
Sent: 2002 m. rugsėjo 30 d. 15:27
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [tied] Lith. Acc.pl.

 >>If you're talking about G.pl. *-o:m (I, perhaps confusingly, wrote *-o~m), yes.
The o-stem gen.pl. consists of stem formant *-o- plus desinence *-om, together
*-oom = *-o:~m (Greek -ô:n), which is different from acc. sg. *-om (Greek -ón)
and presumably also from *-o:m (example perhaps Grk. khthó:n < *dhg^ho:m, with
acute). 

 

Does Lith. akmuo~ belong here (*-o:n), and if it does, why do we have circumflex accent?

 

Sergei